Daily Updates

August 21, 2013

Fort Hood shooting trial focus shifts to suspect

FORT HOOD, Texas — Inside a Texas courthouse surrounded by bomb barricades, Army Maj. Nidal Hasan hasn’t challenged the government’s case that alleges how and why he committed the deadliest mass shooting on a U.S. military base in history.

Instead, outside his trial, Hasan has been telling reporters his side of the 2009 Fort Hood shooting rampage.

Those leaks to the press are among the signs that the Army psychiatrist, who is representing himself and was expected Wednesday to begin presenting his defense, might offer no defense at all in court before jurors weigh his guilt or innocence on charges of killing 13 people and wounding more than 30 others.

Military prosecutors rested Tuesday, the 11th day of the trial, after calling nearly 90 witnesses. Hasan, meanwhile, might not put anyone on the witness stand.

He began the trial signaling that he would call on just two people to testify — one a mitigation expert in capital murder cases and the other a California professor of psychology and religion.

But Hasan on Tuesday indicated to the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, that he would now call neither witness. That left Osborn raising her own skepticism that Hasan would seize his last chance before the case is sent to a jury of 13 military officers.

“We’ll resume (Wednesday) with the defense’s case, if any,” she said.

Striking his witnesses was the latest unusual defense decision by Hasan, who only briefly questioned three prosecutor witnesses, and has otherwise sat quietly at the defense table.

But behind the scenes, Hasan has allowed a former lawyer to give The New York Times documents not part of the trial and sent a personal letter to the local newspaper.

Taken together, they reveal Hasan, an American-born Muslim, justifying the shooting as a necessary killing of American soldiers to protect Muslim insurgents in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The latest were two emails, provided to the Times at Hasan’s request and published by the newspaper Tuesday, in which Hasan asks his Army supervisors how to handle three cases that disturbed him. One involved a soldier who reported to him that U.S. troops had poured 50 gallons of fuel into the Iraqi water supply as revenge.

“I think I need a lot of reassurance for the first few times I come across these,” Hasan wrote in an email on Nov. 2, 2009, three days before the shooting.

Hasan’s email signature included a quote from the Quran: “All praises and thanks go to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the Worlds.”

On the first day of the trial, Hasan had tried to cross-examine a former supervisor about the fuel-dumping allegations, but Osborn quickly silenced him. She ruled the line of questioning out of bounds and not relevant to the case.

Richard Rosen, a military law expert who teaches at Texas Tech University and has followed the trial, said Hasan might be using the media to present the case that Osborn won’t let him in court.

“I thought he might use this as a show trial to kind of put the Americans on trial for things we’re doing in the Middle East and Afghanistan,” Rosen said. “But this may be an alternative means of doing that.”

What’s in the leaks shouldn’t influence the jury, however, since they are barred from reading media reports about the case during the trial.

John Galligan, Hasan’s former criminal lawyer who gave the documents to the Times, told The Associated Press that Osborn barring a “defense of others” strategy by Hasan has made him “little more than a prop in the courtroom.”

Even if Hasan doesn’t call any witnesses, he could put himself on the witness stand. Osborn on Tuesday reminded Hasan that if he did that, he would have to ask questions and then answers his own questions, and not just make statements.

Military law experts say Hasan would have more leeway during the sentencing phase to speak about whatever he wants.

“I suspect if he doesn’t take the stand there, it doesn’t rule out taking the stand in sentencing,” Galligan said.

Many of the government’s witnesses were soldiers who survived being shot. Several identified Hasan as the soldier who, while wearing his Army camouflage uniform, used a laser-sighted handgun to wreak chaos and carnage on the Texas Army post.

Dr. Tonya Kozminski, who worked a Fort Hood hospital shift with Hasan three weeks before the shooting, ended the government’s case by describing what Hasan allegedly told her about getting deployment orders from the Army.

“The last thing he said to me was, ‘They will pay,”’ Kozminski said.

———

Follow Paul J. Weber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/pauljweber

 

1
Text Only
Daily Updates
  • In Other News, April 24

    April 24, 2014

  • Afghan hospital guard kills 3 American doctors

    An Afghan government security guard opened fire Thursday on a group of foreign doctors at a Kabul hospital, killing three American physicians and wounding a U.S. nurse, officials said.

    April 24, 2014

  • Nevada rancher condemned for racist remarks

     A Nevada rancher who has become a conservative folk hero for resisting the federal government’s attempts to round up his cattle faced sharp criticism Thursday for racist comments published in a New York Times article.

    April 24, 2014

  • NRA seeks universal gun law at national meeting

    With concealed weapons now legal in all 50 states, the National Rifle Association’s focus at this week’s annual meeting is less about enacting additional state protections than on making sure the permits already issued still apply when the gun owners travel across the country.

    April 24, 2014

  • 10 Things to Know for Thursday

    Your daily look at late-breaking news, upcoming events and the stories that will be talked about Thursday.

    April 23, 2014

  • In Other News, April 23

    April 23, 2014

  • US weighs clemency for inmates jailed for 10 years

    The Justice Department is encouraging nonviolent federal inmates who have behaved in prison, have no significant criminal history and have already served more than 10 years behind bars to apply for clemency, officials announced Wednesday.

    April 23, 2014

  • High court tosses $3.4M award to child porn victim

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a plea to make it easier for victims of child pornography to collect money from people who view their images online, throwing out a nearly $3.4 million judgment in favor of a woman whose childhood rape has been widely seen on the Internet. Two dissenting justices said Congress should change the law to benefit victims.

    April 23, 2014

  • Airport security vulnerabilities not uncommon

    For all the tens of billions of dollars that the nation has spent on screening passengers and their bags, few airports made a comparable investment to secure the airplanes themselves.

    April 23, 2014

  • Deal signs bill expanding gun rights in Georgia

    Gov. Nathan Deal has signed legislation expanding where people with licenses to carry can bring their guns in Georgia.

    April 23, 2014

AP Video