Opinion

April 4, 2013

State Parole Board responds to letter

(Editor’s note: The State Board of Pardons and Paroles offers the following in response to the guest column dated March 26 by Brenda Hoffmeyer, Victim Services director for the Victim/Witness Assistance Program of the district attorney’s office of the Conasauga Judicial Circuit.)

While the Board disagrees with Ms. Hoffmeyer’s assessments and the information on which she bases them, we agree that the safety of our children and citizens will always be our main objective.

The Board has not changed policy regarding offenders who commit violent criminal acts, particularly sex offenses, and the examples referenced by Ms. Hoffmeyer do not represent the accuracy of the situation.

Last fiscal year, the Board made more than 60,000 votes regarding offender cases. Ms. Hoffmeyer described three cases indicating the offenders should not receive favorable parole consideration based on time served. However, Ms. Hoffmeyer’s information is not completely accurate. In two of the three cases, she cited incorrect information on the offender’s amount of time served, reporting incorrectly that the offenders had served 30 percent or less of their sentences. In one case, she indicated the offender would serve only 30 percent if paroled last month; however that offender has actually served 60 percent of his sentence.

Ms. Hoffmeyer also states that the offenders’ cases should all be level 8 cases and, according to Board policy, the offenders should serve a minimum of 65 percent of their sentence. It should be noted that if the offender’s crime was committed prior to Jan. 1, 2006, the case is not classified as a level 8 offense. Pre-2006 cases of this nature are classified as level 5 crimes and recommended service time is not based on a percentage of the sentence. The case of Robert Lamar Smith, according to Board guidelines, was not a level 8 offense because he committed his crime prior to Jan. 1, 2006.

Ms. Hoffmeyer also incorrectly characterizes the law regarding notifications. State law (OCGA 17-17-13) provides that the Parole Board must give 20 days’ advance notification to a registered victim whenever it considers making a final decision to grant parole and the Board shall provide the victim with an opportunity to file a written objection to such action. This was done in each case cited by Ms. Hoffmeyer. The 72-hour notification Ms. Hoffmeyer cites (OCGA 42-9-47) is to notify victims, the district attorney, presiding judge, sheriff and other necessary parties that a final release decision has been made.

The Board certainly can understand the need for violent offenders, particularly sex offenders, to serve most, if not all, of their time in prison. In all parole cases, the Board must weigh the offender’s risk to re-offend as well as their potential for successful transition back into the community and then exercise its constitutional discretion to grant or deny parole. Ms. Hoffmeyer is correct in that the Board has a difficult job, however the Board accepts this challenging responsibility and stands behind each decision it makes.

Finally, the Board values input from victims and they will always be given the opportunity to have a voice in the parole process. The Department of Corrections and the Board operate a fully staffed Office of Victim Services, which advocates 24/7 for the victims of crime. This staff has a direct line of communication with the Parole Board members. The Board will continue to hold Victims Visitors’ Days where victims can meet directly with Board members. Victims are always able to correspond with the Office of Victim Services at anytime.

The Board continues to be committed to victims, victims’ rights and to working with victim advocates across Georgia.

 

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Citizen of the Week: Kacee Smith of the Georgia Rampage

    When the Georgia Rampage became Dalton’s first professional indoor football team last year, it would have been easy for the owner and players to focus only on drawing attention to themselves as they tried to build up the team’s following.

    April 18, 2014

  • Successes continue at Dalton State College

    These are exciting times for our local college, Dalton State, both on campus and off.

    April 16, 2014

  • Mark Millican: The birds hushed their singing

    For the uninitiated, that line is from what many consider the greatest rock song of all time, “Stairway to Heaven,” by Led Zeppelin.

    April 15, 2014

  • Misty Watson: When blood sugar drops, anger rises

    It wouldn’t have taken 107 married couples and 21 days to figure out that being hungry makes people angry.

    April 15, 2014

  • Working for the man

    You may be one of the many Americans who will rush to file their income taxes today. But you may not yet have earned enough money to pay all of the taxes that will be imposed on you this year.

    April 15, 2014

  • Letter: The glib tongue, the fake smile

    A recent Daily Citizen column by Walter Williams will both awaken and frighten any thinking person who claims even a smidgen of knowledge about — or belief in —  either the Bible, world history or current events.

    April 15, 2014

  • College soccer team would bring local talent together

    Dreams of combining the best soccer players from all local high schools into one team finally could come true.

    April 13, 2014

  • Letter: Primaries feature many choices

    Many people are confused this year about the May 20 Election Day. Unfortunately, very few voters in Whitfield County actually go to the polls for a primary election. But this means any increase in participation can have a significant impact.

    April 12, 2014

  • Letter: Hooper for Murray chief magistrate

    Thanks to all the wonderful people and friends who backed me for District 1 Murray County Board of Education. You sure showed a lot of support. Sorry I had to step down due to my and my wife’s health. I am a lot better now.

    April 12, 2014

  • Judicial dispute could have been avoided

    Judicial elections in Whitfield and Murray counties tend to be low key. In fact, we can’t recall the last time an incumbent judge on the Conasauga Superior Court, which cover the two counties, has even faced a challenger.

    April 12, 2014